- Messages
- 581
- Reaction score
- 353
- Points
- 177
- Boat Make
- Boatless
- Year
- NA
- Boat Model
- 242 Limited S E-Series
- Boat Length
- NA
Okay, here we go with the specification thing again.
A typical unregulated amplifier will produce 25% less power with a 12.6 volt supply than it will at the rated 14.4 volt supply. And the output power continues going down as the supply voltage goes down. You can't get a 14.4 volt supply in a boat. Not even close.
CEA2006 ratings are also taken at one frequency only....1 kHz. You can expect another 10 to 15% drop in power across the entire audio bandwidth.
You can expect another 10% power loss with all channels driven versus being tested one channel at a time.
So you might get 60% of the CEA2006 14.4V @ 1 kHz rated power under real world conditions.
If you are going to live by specs then you should also know a little about the qualifications. Without a little understanding you are simply prey to the manufacturer with the most liberal spec sheet.
Poly Planar would have no idea what the amplifiers really produce. They just know what China tells them they produce. They buy the amplifier from a catalog and slap on their own logo and maybe tool up proprietary end caps.
Then we get to the distortion thing. That's a complete different bag of qualifiers. Testing a Class D analog switching amplifier and getting a true distortion reading is nearly impossible. They can basically rate anything they want and you cannot test it, verify it or dispute it. And there is no governing body to keep these specs honest. In fact, the certifications and birth sheets are created by the importing company, not some independent third party.
So look, the Poly Planar has value. It is a good power per dollar ratio by industry standards. I'll give you no negatives or try to steer you in another direction.
But don't compare it to something like a JL Audio based on such a simple formula of unsubstantiated and misunderstood specs.
A JL Audio XD amplifier, for example, will definitely cost more. And it deserves to cost more. There's also great value in the JL Audio at a much higher price. Why?
More features and versatility on the input section.
All terminations along one side.
Sealed chassis.
Better build quality. Better components.
Class D analog switching at TWICE the speed = more top end bandwidth and significantly lower top end distortion.
Proprietary technology. Domestically engineered by the best in the biz...veterans from the days when Precision Power, Xtant, Phoenix Gold, and Rockford Fosgate where American brands. Not just built to spec good on paper. But to perform good in real world operation.
When independently tested, the JL Audio XD amplifier produced 35% more than its rated output, maintained its 14.4 V rated output even with a 12.6 V supply, exceeding that on the sub channel due to some regulation, and produced 97% of its 1 kHz rating over the entire audio bandwidth. And because the JL Audio will actually meet or exceed spec under all conditions, you can tune the amplifier below the clipping threshold with a simple disc and volt meter, something you cannot do with another brand of amplifier.
And I could go on.
Again, both products have real value and a definite place with consumers. But you just can't compare the two. You are not getting more for less despite the lure of fat specs and low price.
A typical unregulated amplifier will produce 25% less power with a 12.6 volt supply than it will at the rated 14.4 volt supply. And the output power continues going down as the supply voltage goes down. You can't get a 14.4 volt supply in a boat. Not even close.
CEA2006 ratings are also taken at one frequency only....1 kHz. You can expect another 10 to 15% drop in power across the entire audio bandwidth.
You can expect another 10% power loss with all channels driven versus being tested one channel at a time.
So you might get 60% of the CEA2006 14.4V @ 1 kHz rated power under real world conditions.
If you are going to live by specs then you should also know a little about the qualifications. Without a little understanding you are simply prey to the manufacturer with the most liberal spec sheet.
Poly Planar would have no idea what the amplifiers really produce. They just know what China tells them they produce. They buy the amplifier from a catalog and slap on their own logo and maybe tool up proprietary end caps.
Then we get to the distortion thing. That's a complete different bag of qualifiers. Testing a Class D analog switching amplifier and getting a true distortion reading is nearly impossible. They can basically rate anything they want and you cannot test it, verify it or dispute it. And there is no governing body to keep these specs honest. In fact, the certifications and birth sheets are created by the importing company, not some independent third party.
So look, the Poly Planar has value. It is a good power per dollar ratio by industry standards. I'll give you no negatives or try to steer you in another direction.
But don't compare it to something like a JL Audio based on such a simple formula of unsubstantiated and misunderstood specs.
A JL Audio XD amplifier, for example, will definitely cost more. And it deserves to cost more. There's also great value in the JL Audio at a much higher price. Why?
More features and versatility on the input section.
All terminations along one side.
Sealed chassis.
Better build quality. Better components.
Class D analog switching at TWICE the speed = more top end bandwidth and significantly lower top end distortion.
Proprietary technology. Domestically engineered by the best in the biz...veterans from the days when Precision Power, Xtant, Phoenix Gold, and Rockford Fosgate where American brands. Not just built to spec good on paper. But to perform good in real world operation.
When independently tested, the JL Audio XD amplifier produced 35% more than its rated output, maintained its 14.4 V rated output even with a 12.6 V supply, exceeding that on the sub channel due to some regulation, and produced 97% of its 1 kHz rating over the entire audio bandwidth. And because the JL Audio will actually meet or exceed spec under all conditions, you can tune the amplifier below the clipping threshold with a simple disc and volt meter, something you cannot do with another brand of amplifier.
And I could go on.
Again, both products have real value and a definite place with consumers. But you just can't compare the two. You are not getting more for less despite the lure of fat specs and low price.