YamaPissed
Jet Boat Addict
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 28
- Points
- 112
- Boat Make
- Yamaha
- Year
- 2017
- Boat Model
- X
- Boat Length
- 21
Yeah, I'm YamaPissed.
Had I researched the good information on this forum prior to my purchase I probably wouldn't be where I'm at but instead I listened to Yamaha's marketing.
From Yamaha's website: "The triple ballast system adds up to 1,100 pounds (131 gallons) of weight to create the perfect wake for riding or surfing behind the 212X"
I've been a Yamaha customer for 20 years. I've always had good luck with their dirt bikes, street bikes, and waverunners. I purchased a brand new AR 190 last year and, after one season, realized it was under powered. It overheated every time we put two small kids on a tube. Based on all the literature and boat test reviews I read, I figured the 2017 212x was my answer.
$58,000.00 later.
I decided to stay with Yamaha due to no props to worry about for my kids and the ability to wake surf. However, after dropping this amount of cash, there is no conceivable way one can surf ropeless behind this boat with a young family (4 kids two adults) and stock ballast.
I don't believe, after spending this amount of coin, that a boat owner should have to buy another 1,000lbs of ballast and put bags on seats or the swim platform, and buy a wedge (no offense intended wedge makers) when Yamaha bills this as an out of the box surfable boat. I feel deceived by Yamaha's advertising.
In addition, after I had the bimini up for 5 hours, it started separating from the frame.
In addition, the engines got extremely hot tubing with 2 small kids doing 4,000-6,000 rpms.
In addition, the locker ballast pump leaks a huge amount of water when filling the bag.
I expect more for $58k... and I don't believe we, as brand new 212x owners, should have to spend another $1200-$1500 on ballast and wedges just to accomplish what Yamaha advertises the boat is supposed to already do.
I am wishing I would have just bit the bullet and got the VLX, but I took what Yamaha said as truth and wound up extremely disappointed.
Had I researched the good information on this forum prior to my purchase I probably wouldn't be where I'm at but instead I listened to Yamaha's marketing.
From Yamaha's website: "The triple ballast system adds up to 1,100 pounds (131 gallons) of weight to create the perfect wake for riding or surfing behind the 212X"
I've been a Yamaha customer for 20 years. I've always had good luck with their dirt bikes, street bikes, and waverunners. I purchased a brand new AR 190 last year and, after one season, realized it was under powered. It overheated every time we put two small kids on a tube. Based on all the literature and boat test reviews I read, I figured the 2017 212x was my answer.
$58,000.00 later.
I decided to stay with Yamaha due to no props to worry about for my kids and the ability to wake surf. However, after dropping this amount of cash, there is no conceivable way one can surf ropeless behind this boat with a young family (4 kids two adults) and stock ballast.
I don't believe, after spending this amount of coin, that a boat owner should have to buy another 1,000lbs of ballast and put bags on seats or the swim platform, and buy a wedge (no offense intended wedge makers) when Yamaha bills this as an out of the box surfable boat. I feel deceived by Yamaha's advertising.
In addition, after I had the bimini up for 5 hours, it started separating from the frame.
In addition, the engines got extremely hot tubing with 2 small kids doing 4,000-6,000 rpms.
In addition, the locker ballast pump leaks a huge amount of water when filling the bag.
I expect more for $58k... and I don't believe we, as brand new 212x owners, should have to spend another $1200-$1500 on ballast and wedges just to accomplish what Yamaha advertises the boat is supposed to already do.
I am wishing I would have just bit the bullet and got the VLX, but I took what Yamaha said as truth and wound up extremely disappointed.