2kwik4u
Jetboaters Fleet Admiral
- Messages
- 7,746
- Reaction score
- 10,305
- Points
- 577
- Location
- Buffalo, NY
- Boat Make
- Yamaha
- Year
- 2017
- Boat Model
- AR
- Boat Length
- 19
OK, I'm WAY WAY WAY on the other end of this spectrum. My "go to" sunglasses are $3 3M Tinted Safety Glasses.
$3 3M Tinted Lenses on Amazon
How does one compare these to a set of Oakleys that are literally 100x the cost?
Having had both the Oakleys and the 3M's side by side, I prefer the fit, lightness, and the amount of coverage from the 3M's. When the Oakleys got ruined I moved on to cheap gas station/drug store lenses for a number of years. Found these 3M glasses in the back of a truck on a jobsite one day when I needed safety lenses, and it was bright as dammit. Haven't looked back. I buy a 3-pack at Home depot for $9 once a year and I feel like I'm in a pretty good place. If I lose a set of 3M's, well, I'm out $3. Toddler broke a set last summer attempting to put them on his head. 8yr old ran over a set on his bike. I took much better care of my Oakleys when I had them, but it was a constant stress to manage the location and condition of my sunglasses, now I DGAF about them because I have a backup pair in every vehicle, on the workbench, and they only cost $3.
I'm not trying to be a dick, but what am I missing here? I'm honestly curious what the extra $297 buys me. Clearly we have some people from the industry in here, what are the real differences in terms of eye protection? Assuming clarity is subjective (if you have bad eyes to begin with seeing something "clearer" isn't really a benefit), and quality is relative (You get the quality you pay for), protection is the name of the game right? Do the nicer lenses block more UV? Broader spectrum of light? Am I going to damage my eyes with prolonged use of "cheap" sunglasses? How does wearing a pair of cheap sunglasses compare to no sunglasses at all, compared with a set of "high end" sunglasses?
Again, not attempting to be a dick or stir the pot, just genuinely curious to get some insight from industry insiders.
$3 3M Tinted Lenses on Amazon
How does one compare these to a set of Oakleys that are literally 100x the cost?
Having had both the Oakleys and the 3M's side by side, I prefer the fit, lightness, and the amount of coverage from the 3M's. When the Oakleys got ruined I moved on to cheap gas station/drug store lenses for a number of years. Found these 3M glasses in the back of a truck on a jobsite one day when I needed safety lenses, and it was bright as dammit. Haven't looked back. I buy a 3-pack at Home depot for $9 once a year and I feel like I'm in a pretty good place. If I lose a set of 3M's, well, I'm out $3. Toddler broke a set last summer attempting to put them on his head. 8yr old ran over a set on his bike. I took much better care of my Oakleys when I had them, but it was a constant stress to manage the location and condition of my sunglasses, now I DGAF about them because I have a backup pair in every vehicle, on the workbench, and they only cost $3.
I'm not trying to be a dick, but what am I missing here? I'm honestly curious what the extra $297 buys me. Clearly we have some people from the industry in here, what are the real differences in terms of eye protection? Assuming clarity is subjective (if you have bad eyes to begin with seeing something "clearer" isn't really a benefit), and quality is relative (You get the quality you pay for), protection is the name of the game right? Do the nicer lenses block more UV? Broader spectrum of light? Am I going to damage my eyes with prolonged use of "cheap" sunglasses? How does wearing a pair of cheap sunglasses compare to no sunglasses at all, compared with a set of "high end" sunglasses?
Again, not attempting to be a dick or stir the pot, just genuinely curious to get some insight from industry insiders.