212s
Jetboaters Captain
- Messages
- 2,261
- Reaction score
- 1,601
- Points
- 237
- Location
- 1000 Islands
- Boat Make
- Yamaha
- Year
- 2020
- Boat Model
- 212S
- Boat Length
- 21
Haven't tried it but cutting thrust in half would likely mean speed is cut - due to less resistance at low speeds one engine would mean probably 1/3 loss of no wake speeds so maybe 5 down to 3.5 mph, and puttering around doesn't use much fuel - best mileage comes at idle speeds. At idle I can putter along all day and hardly use any fuel, about 30 miles with only 12 gals consumed over the course of 6 hours. Same applies to our old I/O drive where we could putter around all day and not use much fuel. And as someone else mentioned, perhaps less maneuvering control which could be the difference between a close call and an accident if you're not paying attention. Keep in mind that for fuel consumption numbers, a single supercharged engine uses about the same fuel as twin normally aspirated engines and gives similar performance in the 19 and 21 footers.Advance apologies if this subject has already been beat to death- but I have not seen it yet . . . .
When a lot of time and distance is spent at low speeds like 5 - 15 mph, in no-wake zones or cocktail cruising, etc, is there any fuel-consumption advantage to running on one engine instead of both ?
It seems intuitive that one engine at slow speeds would result in better mpg numbers; but is that true? Has anyone tried it ?
I wouldn't worry about it at all. Toodle around if you want, and crack it open when you want. The only time I would use one engine is during a failure and I have to limp back home. Something I do as well is start and stop in the same order to keep the hours meters the same...I'm a little OCD about stuff like that.