First things first. That is an opinion piece, nothing more, nothing less. That last paragraph has the key word; believe.
View attachment 187704
Sure you can be skeptical, sure you can say the reviews aren't worth a crap. I suggest posting alternative data instead of opinions about the validity of the data presented. Without a second source, how are we to judge outside of anecdotal evidence, and if that's where we're going to base our decisions, well, lets just call it agree to disagree because it's all subjective from there.
Secondly, you're acting like I hurt your feelings here........If that's the case I didn't mean to. I'm just trying to state my thoughts, for better or worse they aren't in alignment with yours. It's not a personal attack, just a difference of opinions.
And finally, my thoughts reworded for clarity,
You're kind of missing the bigger picture here. It's not the Toyota's aren't reliable, or there is a ruse afoot to convince everyone that they are reliable. They are. They're excellent vehicles that will serve people many wonderful miles of ownership. So are GMs, and Hyundais, Hondas, and a bunch of other brands. They're all excellent machines with excellent quality and reliability.
My point is that the quality gap between a Toyota and most other manufacturers is not as great as the sell prices would suggest. People buy for all kinds of reasons, and buying is what generates demand. The demand for a Toyota is higher, not because it has higher measurable quality, but because it has a higher perceived quality. This distinction is important, and central to the point.
The domestic automakers have increased quality faster than public perception has changed. This leads to the higher demand, and subsequent higher prices.