BlkGS
Jetboaters Captain
- Messages
- 2,133
- Reaction score
- 1,498
- Points
- 242
- Location
- Melbourne, FL
- Boat Make
- Yamaha
- Year
- 2007
- Boat Model
- SX
- Boat Length
- 23
I remember when that came out and was shocked to see how far Honda had fallen. They had always been known for stone cold reliability, albeit very boring like Toyota. There's been similar studies come out since that I've stumbled across and have always been surprised. Generally now a days I think most cars are relatively reliable, if taken care of. If I wanted something boring but reliable I'd still lean towards Toyota or Honda. Largely just for old school reputation, and nothing else. Granted I've owned a butt load of Honda's and not had any issues with nearly all of them approaching 200k miles. My F150 I feel would fall apart before 200k. LOL! Granted it is also used harder and the components are pushed to their edge just based on their design. Sort of like Yamaha and Seadoo. You want reliability you go with Yamaha. You want cutting edge technology with every spare ounce of power squeezed out you go with seadoo. However, you sacrifice reliability with that choice.
Kind of a interesting point about how hard the truck gets used vs a car.
You don't see many work tundra. People who depend on their truck as a tool every day tend to go Ford or.chevy from.what I see. Partially due to attractive fleet pricing, sure, but the operating cost would offset that. So if tundra were truly that much better, you'd see them dominant in work trucks. Yet instead, tundra are virtually non existent in work trucks, restricted to largely one man outfits, and instead you see toyotas do well in the low impact commuter car segment.
Food for thought.