• Welcome to Jetboaters.net!

    We are delighted you have found your way to the best Jet Boaters Forum on the internet! Please consider Signing Up so that you can enjoy all the features and offers on the forum. We have members with boats from all the major manufacturers including Yamaha, Seadoo, Scarab and Chaparral. We don't email you SPAM, and the site is totally non-commercial. So what's to lose? IT IS FREE!

    Membership allows you to ask questions (no matter how mundane), meet up with other jet boaters, see full images (not just thumbnails), browse the member map and qualifies you for members only discounts offered by vendors who run specials for our members only! (It also gets rid of this banner!)

    free hit counter

Trailer Bunk Fitment

1BadTundra

Jet Boat Junkie
Messages
449
Reaction score
476
Points
137
Boat Make
Yamaha
Year
2016
Boat Model
212X
Boat Length
21
I've always been told that the bunks should overhang past the boat at least 2" to ensure there is proper support on the transom. On my 212x and Shorelander trailer, this is not the case. My rear bunks are about 5" away from even touching the back of the boat. Is this correct for these boats?
 
I never heard that. This is my 4th boat - all different flavors and I am sure the bunks on none of them extended past the boat. What you describe is the way mine sits on trailer. Personally I think it's good that they stop short of the ride plates or whatever those black plates are calledIMG_21971.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I've always been told that the bunks should overhang past the boat at least 2" to ensure there is proper support on the transom. On my 212x and Shorelander trailer, this is not the case. My rear bunks are about 5" away from even touching the back of the boat. Is this correct for these boats?

This may be appropriate advice for an outboard, which seems like it would make sense. The additional bunk support could help with the downward force of the motor. Not certain of this, but it sounds reasonable. That being said, if that's the actual reason, then you'd consider where your motors are placed, and look at what else from that point back would stress the transom.

I think @Bruce or @Betik replaced their rear bunks with longer boards, and it helped with recovery at the launch, and centering the boat sooner, so there's at least some reasoning behind going with longer bunks, if you wanted to. If/when the time comes (or I have a need to fill my time with more stuff to do), that's the reason I'd consider going with longer rear bunks. @AlpharettaRK shows a possible reason not to, as well, if you're at all concerned about that.
 
After moving my bow stop to get the tongue weight within reason, my bunk boards were about 6 inched from the transom edge. When i replaced my rotted bunk boards i made them longer to get to the edge now.
On these there isn’t as much transom weight as boats with a outboard or sterndrive hanging off
 
I think @Bruce or @Betik replaced their rear bunks with longer boards, and it helped with recovery at the launch, and centering the boat sooner, so there's at least some reasoning behind going with longer bunks, if you wanted to.

I stuck with standard length. I believe they were 5' in the aft and 10’ fore for my 230. I am approaching another bunk change.
 
Last edited:
This may be appropriate advice for an outboard, which seems like it would make sense. The additional bunk support could help with the downward force of the motor. Not certain of this, but it sounds reasonable. That being said, if that's the actual reason, then you'd consider where your motors are placed, and look at what else from that point back would stress the transom.

I think @Bruce or @Betik replaced their rear bunks with longer boards, and it helped with recovery at the launch, and centering the boat sooner, so there's at least some reasoning behind going with longer bunks, if you wanted to. If/when the time comes (or I have a need to fill my time with more stuff to do), that's the reason I'd consider going with longer rear bunks. @AlpharettaRK shows a possible reason not to, as well, if you're at all concerned about that.
You may be on to something... My past boats were outboards, that must've been the reason for the transom support.
 
I stuck with standard length. I believe they were 10' in the aft and 5' fore for my 230. I am approaching another bunk change.
10' rear bunks? That's almost double the length of mine.
 
You may be on to something... My past boats were outboards, that must've been the reason for the transom support.
Lots of folks with outboards add something like this when trailering for that reason. No need on our boats!
1720810465862.png
 
Back
Top