- Messages
- 13,384
- Reaction score
- 13,502
- Points
- 857
- Location
- Royal, AR
- Boat Make
- Yamaha
- Year
- 2007
- Boat Model
- SX
- Boat Length
- 23
We are delighted you have found your way to the best Jet Boaters Forum on the internet! Please consider Signing Up so that you can enjoy all the features and offers on the forum. We have members with boats from all the major manufacturers including Yamaha, Seadoo, Scarab and Chaparral. We don't email you SPAM, and the site is totally non-commercial. So what's to lose? IT IS FREE!
Membership allows you to ask questions (no matter how mundane), meet up with other jet boaters, see full images (not just thumbnails), browse the member map and qualifies you for members only discounts offered by vendors who run specials for our members only! (It also gets rid of this banner!)
Do you know if all these labs/companies are working together or is this a race to see who gets there first?One more thing about covid virus "manipulation", it can be confusing.
It is actually key to develop a vaccine. For example, several US labs currently work to generate a chimeric virus that appears identical to COVID-19 on the outside but contains the replication machinery of the livestock pathogen vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) on the inside. That particular livestock pathogen does not cause disease in humans, and formed the basis for the Ebola vaccine in current use, and is therefore an appealing platform for a future Co-V2 vaccine.
Now - that's a man made virus.
--
I'm not a virologist, however the simple answer would be no, the SARS (like lenti) is an RNA virus but (unlike lenti) not a retrovirus, so it does not involve DNA in the replication cycle, while the lentiviruses are used as they can incorporate into both mitotically active and resting cells.@swatski, have you seen anything that documents the packaging capacity of Sars-Cov-2? If it is similar to that of lentivirus that would be very interesting.
Some of those efforts are in NIH-funded academic labs and university-affiliated hospitals, other are commercial.Do you know if all these labs/companies are working together or is this a race to see who gets there first?
This is sad. It truly is. I agree with these nurses that must go to work everyday without the proper PPE. "There's plenty of masks" I keep hearing; everyday F'n day. Doesn't this piss you off? Why can't they get them? Is there a shortage or is there a stockpile for the government (as Jared stated). I feel this whole thing was handled poorly. We should never be in this state of crisis we're in as nurses are now walking off the job. Who's fault is this?
When the ship is going down, is the captain the first one off and then directs from the sidelines? I think not...
Wouldn't it make sense to all work together or at least share whats been done? I am a true believer of "A well defined problem is already half solved". If we could share what we already know with each other, we might find a vaccine quicker. Right? To me this is common sense. Again, greed/money is involved and mucking everything up. We are truly our own worst enemy.Some of those efforts are in NIH-funded academic labs and university-affiliated hospitals, other are commercial.
There is not much of a cohesive action, Fauci is getting old, and I don't even know how he can stand the treatment he receives. PArtly also that's why the anti-WHO and anti-Gates foundation rhetoric is so toxic.
--
PPE and other equipment is handled by the governor of each state IIRC.
The biggest issues with PPE are lack of production capacity and a market that is hungry for it. I hope that we will learn the importance of producing more domestically. My state is flying PPE in from China.
In times of crisis too?
Until there is a vaccine, the next best things is to test. We need to be able to test everyone quickly. This would open the door to a lot.
To me this is just common sense. Do you have a GPS on your boat? Why? Do you know how your GPS works? Guess what happens when it has no data?100% agree. give us some guidance on who/where to shelter in place. rather than this blanket one that will ultimately hurt us all. seems smart to me. but. we're in this fun world of loud ideology over quiet fact. Winning over learning.
Our school year is no more as of today, thus our school soccer season.... Truthfully...I'm not certain I would have sent them if it did come back. we have 26 cases in our small county(20,000), but only 150 tests. I would bargain that its WAAAY higher. seems to grow by 4 or so every day.
Also Saw Something funny and dumb In the news today.... and well... Id just assume get my health info from Dr Evil, than I would Dr's Phil or Oz. lol
Regarding the big news of the leaked video overnight from part of the large remdesivir study by Gilead:
That U of Chicago uncontrolled study was part of a large (~2400 patients), multi-research-hospital study that Gilead has underway. It includes various types of sub-studies with different purposes.
The U of Chicago was not a controlled, double-blind, placebo study, those are underway elsewhere as part of the broader, coordinated study. Preliminary data are expected from those by the end of April. The U of Chicago study was designed to determine the better medication regime of two choices: shorter vs longer duration therapy (I believe it was 6 day course vs 10 day course). This *very preliminary* info is highly encouraging in a couple of ways:
1) this drug was originally developed for other purposes (I believe it was to fight ebola), so its major side effects risks are largely known
2) Gilead had enough confidence in the drug to test different treatments, indicating their *in vitro* testing showed positive results
3) The average length of time for the "severely ill" COVID-19 patients to move from start of med therapy to hospital discharge from hospital was ~6 days... in terms of better patient outcomes and more capacity to handle the pandemic, total cost, most other system-stressors... quicker time to successful treatment and discharge is nearly always better
4) the 113 successful discharges with 2 deaths out of 125 in study is *highly* encouraging as those in ICU have been looking at fatality odds at least one order of magnitude higher than that (vs US/UK/Italy/Spain experiential data)
As said by others, this is *very* preliminary. But it is also, *very* encouraging. And it is data-based, not anecdotal.
I'll take potential good news like this against the flood of bad news we've all been facing for the last 3 months.
Until there is a vaccine, the next best things is to test. We need to be able to test everyone quickly. This would open the door to a lot.