FSH 210 Sport
Jetboaters Admiral
- Messages
- 6,970
- Reaction score
- 8,345
- Points
- 482
- Location
- Tranquility Base
- Boat Make
- Yamaha
- Year
- 2020
- Boat Model
- FSH Sport
- Boat Length
- 21
The loss of comms occurred at 1:45, at the given rate of decent the sub would not have been close to the bottom or the wreck.
That part about being bolted in is a huge no go for me. Apollo 1 taught the world that was a bad idea.
That article about the former employee reads like most other accident reports… when the Orville spillway failed a year and a half ago I said to myself at the time that somewhere some employee had been screaming about the problems and was either blown off or fired. As it turns out there was such an employee but as per usual nothing will happen to those responsible. The information in that article will probably play heavily in the upcoming, while I hope not, wrongful death and or criminally negligent law suit.
I will say again, I hope that I am wrong, but, I think there was a catastrophic failure at the 1:45 mark and that was it. When you consider that the sub descended repeatedly to 400 atmosphere’s, which is 5,880 psi, allegedly without NDT, that is a RX for a predicable disaster. After what I read alleging that the view port was only good for 1300 meters and the sub descends to 4000 meters sounds like that is the most plausible point of failure. If that happened in a catastrophic fashion, they would not have known what hit them.
After the Thresher disaster the Navy under Rickover instituted the sub safe program and that has served well to this day… I’m sure the Navy boys here will correct me if wrong, or can chime in with further comments. I had several Navy Nukes that worked for me and they told me a lot about the sub safe program, and none of what I read in the linked whistleblower article would be acceptable in the Nav.
I hope that the banging sound that was heard is them and that an effective rescue can be realized.
That part about being bolted in is a huge no go for me. Apollo 1 taught the world that was a bad idea.
That article about the former employee reads like most other accident reports… when the Orville spillway failed a year and a half ago I said to myself at the time that somewhere some employee had been screaming about the problems and was either blown off or fired. As it turns out there was such an employee but as per usual nothing will happen to those responsible. The information in that article will probably play heavily in the upcoming, while I hope not, wrongful death and or criminally negligent law suit.
I will say again, I hope that I am wrong, but, I think there was a catastrophic failure at the 1:45 mark and that was it. When you consider that the sub descended repeatedly to 400 atmosphere’s, which is 5,880 psi, allegedly without NDT, that is a RX for a predicable disaster. After what I read alleging that the view port was only good for 1300 meters and the sub descends to 4000 meters sounds like that is the most plausible point of failure. If that happened in a catastrophic fashion, they would not have known what hit them.
After the Thresher disaster the Navy under Rickover instituted the sub safe program and that has served well to this day… I’m sure the Navy boys here will correct me if wrong, or can chime in with further comments. I had several Navy Nukes that worked for me and they told me a lot about the sub safe program, and none of what I read in the linked whistleblower article would be acceptable in the Nav.
I hope that the banging sound that was heard is them and that an effective rescue can be realized.
Last edited: