msavold
Jetboaters Admiral
- Messages
- 768
- Reaction score
- 1,399
- Points
- 252
- Location
- Columbia, MD
- Boat Make
- Yamaha
- Year
- 2012
- Boat Model
- SX
- Boat Length
- 24
New to jet boats and Yamaha in particular, I've been doing some research and reading. According to some (cough, cough, Chaparral forums...) they are useless noisy, thirsty toys! Well, where we plan to use the boat, the water's shallow so a Yamaha is perfect for us - but what about the noisy/thirsty question? Didn't seem like it to me at first glance...
So I went to boattest.com and copied some of their test data into a spreadsheet and the results were surprising. (Note: the comparison is limited to other boats that we thought could have fit our mission profile - before we found out how much better a Yamaha would be for us!)
At equivalent speeds:
So I went to boattest.com and copied some of their test data into a spreadsheet and the results were surprising. (Note: the comparison is limited to other boats that we thought could have fit our mission profile - before we found out how much better a Yamaha would be for us!)
At equivalent speeds:
- The new AR240HO is quieter at equivalent speeds than a Bennington or Sun Tracker pontoon.
- The new AR240HO is quieter than the Chaparral Sunesta 224 with a 260hp i/o. The previous model is noisier, but not as much as I would have thought based on the comments.
- With the exception of the new Chaparral jet boats fuel consumption is almost identical for all types of boats at speeds less than 10mph and and things even out when flat out too with the i/o drinking more above 45mph than the new AR240! The previous model drinks more at the low end but from 35mph up, less than the i/o
- The new Chaparral jet boats are noisy, thirsty pigs! There, I said it!