BlkGS
Jetboaters Admiral
- Messages
- 2,159
- Reaction score
- 1,513
- Points
- 252
- Location
- Melbourne, FL
- Boat Make
- Yamaha
- Year
- 2007
- Boat Model
- SX
- Boat Length
- 23
Part of the problem is facts are not really facts. Those political fact checkers are garbage (I would assume so are Facebooks). I remember seeing something that it said was not a fact but if you read in the article supporting its decision - it was like 90% true. Because of this, people don't trust anything. Political stuff is one thing since finding the truth is very difficult, and even then there are multiple truths. Scientific fact is another. My favorite is Journey to the Middle of the Earth. People believe that lol.
The other issue with science is there are very few "facts". We have a lot ifnreally well supported theories, but very few facts. Going from theory to fact is a lot harder than people think it is, you have to effectively test every possible way to disprove the theory, and them all fail. Semantics, sure, but semantics are kind of the issue here.
The other issue is money. Money is the lifeblood of science research, and the whole grant process is so insanely corrupt and broken its absurd. There's enough academics out there that you'll find someone to find the results you want for the right grant price.
Everything nowdays is covered with a thick layer of bias. When Trump pulled out of the Paris Accord some people claimed that it was a world ending decision and the Paris Accord was our only hope. But when you actually look at the goals of the Paris Accord, it was to slow the rate of growth of emissions. That's not at all how it was touted orarketed, but the actual goal was to slow the acceleration rate. That meant it still allowed for more emissions, it still allowed for the rate of e.issions to increase, and it's whole goal was to try to make that rate increases rate of increase slow down. So in effect, nothing. But depending on the bias, it was a doomsday sentence to leave the accords.