You mean the updated results on the screen where the republican candidate has less votes than he had since the prior update? (so he "lost" votes in the update?) I know that happens when a county is suspect on their quick math and they take it out while they figure out what the heck happened. Happened in Michigan to Biden I'm sure, while they figured out why the quick counts were wrong in Antrim. One of many plausible explanations for a change of this type.
Again, a suspicious artifact out of context, but when fully examined it is very likely to amount to nothing. Not saying it's nothing, but I am saying calling this "proof" of any fraud is an even bigger leap.
If you start with the premise.."These elections in the past have used the SAME methods and nobody before has found concerning Fraud...and we are seeing these odd things...let's review them to make sure the numbers are right" You may get more play time. If you start with "These are some thieving MFs who want to steal the votes" Those not drinking the kool-aid point out that's too big a leap and you have not proof (yet?) to make those statements. Find your evidence and it enables you to make those claims. But until then, all you have is suspicion, and not something that is very convincing, so for the non-believers your message seems alarmist and does not resonate.
There are even fewer safeguards in Texas and we don't see Biden nitpicking any discrepancies there. I'm sure they will also investigate if they see anything suspicious, but there is not prior scream of fraud before the convincing proof is published. That's the right order, investigate first and accuse second.
I am not sure why you do not understand this, but this is NEW technology that has not been used before except in a few states, Did you even bother to read the AP article I provided???
The article also stated this technology was never meant to run a whole voter precinct, it was meant as a tool for disabled voters.
I never said anything about mail-in voting.
I have not said anything about any party or any party candidate.
I don’t disagree mail-in voting would would favor one party over another.
I have not attacked anyone on this thread, i have though responded in kind.....
This thread is about touch-screen electronic machines flipping thousands of votes, CONFIRMED now in two elections, not being reported by many in the media, even being defended or bushed off by some of you on here.......
The real concern is some of you seem to follow the incorrect assumption that “millions of fraud” has to occur to affect an election.
We’ve now had TWO elections in a row that determined a winner.....with only thousands of votes in a few states determining the outcome.....yet some of you won’t even think about that. Instead you want to attack me for bringing it up........
And no, i have not broken any forum rules, i will not be bullied to leave, and if people are offended because i shared a topic that effects us all then just stay off the topic......
)
