- Messages
- 18,593
- Reaction score
- 20,904
- Points
- 1,082
- Location
- Raleigh, NC 27614
- Boat Make
- Yamaha
- Year
- 2016
- Boat Model
- 242X E-Series
- Boat Length
- 24
Which is why they keep it secret....Of course this just happen 2 month after I bought a AR192.
We are delighted you have found your way to the best Jet Boaters Forum on the internet! Please consider Signing Up so that you can enjoy all the features and offers on the forum. We have members with boats from all the major manufacturers including Yamaha, Seadoo, Scarab and Chaparral. We don't email you SPAM, and the site is totally non-commercial. So what's to lose? IT IS FREE!
Membership allows you to ask questions (no matter how mundane), meet up with other jet boaters, see full images (not just thumbnails), browse the member map and qualifies you for members only discounts offered by vendors who run specials for our members only! (It also gets rid of this banner!)
Which is why they keep it secret....Of course this just happen 2 month after I bought a AR192.
Thank you for the reminder. I forgot I had read that in the info somewhere ..Somehow missing from the 195 model discussion here is one important fact:
SVHOs require PREMIUM fuel.
As in 91+ octane.
It maybe something many prospective buyers would want to consider.
Technically not.Did the SHOs in the 192 not require premium?
I am by no means up to date on all the information but I believe they Yamaha only offers a twin in the 21 & 24 not the 19. The new AR 210 is something that I want to see the performance numbers on. It has the new (to the boat) TR-1 High Output and if I am not mistaken is a 3-cylinder engine. According to my Yamaha dealer, each engine is 123 horsepower (~246 total). Now what I would like to see is a comparison of the new AR195 to the AR 210. The 210 is two feet longer and 1000 lbs heavier with the same relative horsepower but coming from two engines. Should have more torque and pull much better, right?Did the SHOs in the 192 not require premium? Given these boats use a lot of fuel, would a twin TR1 (115 hp) setup be more efficient with similar performance? Do any of the jetboat makers offer a twin engine option in their 19 footers?
Technically not.
The 87 octane has more "punch" as it ignites faster, just don't use it if you turn up the boost or increase the compression.
The only thing octane does is prevent detonation in the combustion chamber before a spark is introduced, more compression needs more octane.
SHO cruiser manual states to use just regular unleaded fuel. However, most everyone on greenhulk uses higher octane.Isn't it true that the waverunners with the same SHO engine, recommend premium or did I read something that is wrong?
Not the way it is currently configured...no way. Could it be done...sure! Yamaha used to have a twin engine 19' boat....the LS2000 series. I owned an LX210 (which despite the name was an 19' twin engine jet boat). It has twin 135hp engines and was a BLAST to drive. Twin TR-1s in a 19' boat would be cool...I wonder if the issue is engine compartment space? I wonder if twin TR1 (they are tiny) would fit in a 19 foot compartment for Yamaha?
That is what I thought but the salesman at the Yamaha place kept saying that because two engines are pulling instead of one it would still pull better than the single engine. I don't understand how but I would really like to see some performance numbers on both the new AR195 and AR210.I believe they are 115 each. There is no way the heavier less powered 210 will match the performance of a 195.
195 should be faster. But I wouldn't be surprised if 210 has a better hole shot.That is what I thought but the salesman at the Yamaha place kept saying that because two engines are pulling instead of one it would still pull better than the single engine. I don't understand how but I would really like to see some performance numbers on both the new AR195 and AR210.