I mean... exactly.
I'm trying to follow this case (why oh why?) - and am entirely confused at this point - what does this guy want? Did they not offer him 1. money/buyout, 2. a new boat, 3. fixing the problem in their factory?
I also would not underestimate the factory's ability to actually fix/re-level the floor. They put these things together and they know a thing or two. So, if they want to do this - why not? You can always reject the fix if it doesn't look right, at this point what's the difference? I highly doubt they would offer a fix without knowing they can do this. Replacing the deck in a fiberglass boat is not rocket science, especially inside a factory facilities...
This sounds like a complete bs: the guy is running around with a little level... Doing what? The roof is concave, is the pilot house floor leveled? There is just so many unanswered questions...
Having recently found myself in a very similar (in a way) position where I had a legitimate warranty claim(s) completely denied, I'm looking at this and literally scratching my head... In my case, I would have taken any of the three options offered to the Reef dude, and I would be singing praises for the company that does that.
IDK... If there is more to it - let's see the communications, at least he is getting things from them in writing! (I didn't).
The Parker company does not seem in denial at all, in fact their comments appear to completely acknowledge there is an issue, offering a fix or a buyout. They did NOT tell him to go jump in the lake.
Also, his deleting the company's public comments is fishy, is it not? Why do that? - I really wonder what is going on. Am I the only one here who feels that way? Not that I care, but to me this is just starting to look stupid.
--